CICC off with Question Time

I’m always excited to see Christians engaging with contemporary issues, so I was very pleased to see that Evangelical Alliance Wales are launching the Cymru Institute for Contemporary Christianity (CICC for short – “Cymru” means “Wales” in Welsh, by the way).

Kicking off CICC, a series of events was held across Wales, including a Question Time event here in Cardiff. Chaired by Roy Jenkins, presenter of BBC Radio Wales’ All Things Considered, it brought together a collection of sharp minds onto a panel to answer the tough questions facing Christians in today’s society.
The speakers were: Dan Boucher, director of parliamentary affairs for CARE; Joel Edwards, international director for Micah Challenge and former head of the Evangelical Alliance; Michael Green, evangelist and former advisor to the Archbishop of Canterbury; Elaine Storkey, feminist theologian and head of Tearfund; and David Williamson, political journalist on the Western Mail.

Questions included such thorny subjects as:
  • “Should Terry Pratchett have the right to end his own life with dignity?”
  • “Is Christianity being bullyingly marginalized in the UK?”
  • “Is torture ever justified in the fight against terror?”
  • “Where was God when the earthquake happened in Haiti?”
The panellists all brought in interesting perspectives on the different questions. I found the answers to the question about whether Christianity is marginalised to be particularly interesting. Dave Williamson and Joel Edwards both made the point that we’re moving to a post-Christendom situation where Christianity’s traditional privileges are being removed, with Joel Edwards being fairly upbeat about the level of Christian involvement on a more level playing field.
On the other hand, Dan Boucher argued that we’re not moving to a level playing field, but that all faiths are being pushed out of the public sphere, while Michael Green gave examples of situations where Christians do indeed seem to have come in for particular difficulties, such as a nun whose distinctively Christian dress was deemed not acceptable in a hospital, though it had no problems with Muslims wearing the veil. Between them, the panellists gave a broad and nuanced view of the challenges and opportunities facing Christians in the public sphere.
But if there was a weakness to the event, it was that the panellists didn’t disagree enough! I think their outlooks were not wildly different, and it would have been much more interesting to have, say, an ardent socialist sitting alongside a fire-breathing conservative. One of the strengths of the British political scene is that Christians aren’t associated with any one particular party, so it shouldn’t be too difficult to find people willing to disagree with each other!
I think the type of questions asked also lent themselves to consensus rather than conflict. They were often at a fairly general level, rather than relating to specific policies, legislation or situations. If questions were more specific, this would probably bring out more disagreement; it’s relatively easy to agree on principles, but much harder to agree exactly how to put them into practice! We need as Christians to get down to the fine details, to show that our faith is relevant not just in theory, but actually in practice too.

On this note, I was disappointed that the question of “Who as a Christian should I vote for in the general election?” wasn’t discussed. (But then, I didn’t send in any questions, so perhaps I only have myself to blame!) The closest we got was the question “should preachers should tell their congregations who to vote for?”, which the panel rightly answered with an unanimous “no”.
But a discussion-based event such as this one is exactly the kind of place where this question ought to be discussed. No, there isn’t a neat and clear answer, and there shouldn’t be any room for partisanship – which is precisely why Christians need to discuss this question openly and thoughtfully.
Overall it was tremendous to see Christians gathered to discuss public issues, and I think that CICC’s vision and objectives are great – I’ll be eagerly watching to see how it develops. I’m also glad that there were similar events in Colwyn Bay and Swansea, making it more of a genuinely all-Wales initiative. As with the newly launched National Theatre of Wales touring the country, it’s nice to see increasing recognition that there’s more to Wales than just Cardiff!
Posted in Faith, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A quick note

This is just to say that I haven’t forgotten about my blog, despite the recent lack of blog posts. There are a number of reasons for this, the main two being a new job that has been keeping me a bit busier over the last few months, and that I’ve been knuckling down to work hard on finishing my novel. I’m now on around the 80,000 word mark (the length of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, to give a well-known point of comparison), which is around three quarters of the way through my story. But I’ve got some material in the pipeline, so stay tuned!

Posted in Personal, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

L’Abri Ideas Library now online

I’ve been to the English L’Abri community a few times, and L’Abri has really helped me in thinking through different aspects of my faith. Back at their film festival in 2008, I heard that they were planning to put their vast library of talks online soon. Over a year later, the L’Abri Ideas Library is now live!

The site contains hundreds of talks from a Christian perspective on all sorts of subjects and topics, from the Bible to Buddhism, epistemology to ecology, theology to theatre. Here are some of the categories:
  • What in the world is real?
  • Has anyone spoken?
  • What does it mean to be human?
  • What is spiritual reality?
  • How shall we then live?
It’ll certainly give me plenty of interesting and thoughtful material to listen to on my mp3 player! The talks include many by Francis Schaeffer, the Christian pastor and thinker who founded L’Abri and who wrote many interesting books of apologetics. Whatever you’re interested in, there’s a good chance you’ll find a talk to interest you on the site, so I thoroughly recommend you check it out!
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Jesus Comic

My friend Jason is a very talented cartoonist, and I’ve been excited by his Jesus Comic project since he gave me a sneak preview. But it has now hit the iPhone for the world at large to download and enjoy!

Now as much as I’d like one, I can’t really justify the expense of an iPhone, and so can’t download it myself. But I’ve seen the artwork and it’s a really cool way of telling the story of Jesus. It’s almost entirely visual (though you can bring up some summary text on the chapter heading panels). It’s very fun and creative, a great way bringing the Jesus story onto new technology.

As a free taster, you can download the first chapter, Nativity, which tells the Christmas story. Now, if I can just convince myself that I actually really, really need an iPhone or iPod Touch, then I’ll download it in a shot!

You can download the Jesus Comic from the iTunes app store, and there’s also a Jesus Comic Facebook page where you can leave comments and stuff.

Posted in Digital | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Understanding is not excusing

In October, I was on a weekend writing course. In one of the sessions, we looked at a script for a short film, and how it changed in redrafting. Racist bullies kill a young boy in it. In earlier drafts the bullies were just a generic mob, but in rewriting, the character of the leader of the group was developed a bit more, hinting at a troubled home life. One of the people on the course asked if this was really necessary – isn’t it enough that some people are “just evil”?

Well, no, I don’t think so. One of the tasks of a writer is to get inside people’s heads. A writer has to be fundamentally curious about what makes people tick. To say that someone is “just evil” and leave it at that is not to do justice to the complexity of who we are as human beings.

Humans are never simply “just evil”. We are moral creatures; not in the sense that we are always morally good, but that we aspire to be good. This gives us the ability to fail and be bad, and to deceive ourselves and be hypocrites. And occasionally we manage to get things right!

We continually seek to justify our own actions to ourselves. We rarely believe our actions are actually wrong at the time, even if we would normally consider them wrong. We try to convince ourselves that we are a special case, that we have special circumstances, for long enough to go through with it. Sometimes our reasons are good and valid; sometimes they are false and self-serving.

When writing, it fails to do justice to a character’s full humanity not to ask how they saw their actions, how they justified their behaviour to themselves, whether they felt any guilt or doubt, what drove them to make the choices they made, and so on.

Asking these questions sometimes makes people uncomfortable. It can seem as if the writer is excusing a character’s behaviour. And sometimes some people do diminish individual responsibility – they blame a person’s upbringing, or the society in which they grew up, and so on.

But to make people nothing more than the product of their past and environment also robs people of their humanity. We are all shaped by our background, but we are still responsible for their choices and actions. We all try and justify our actions to ourselves, but there are both true and false justifications; right and wrong decisions. Understanding the background and thinking that shaped and informed someone’s choice does not make it any less their choice; understanding does not rob them of responsibility, whether for good or bad.

The writer’s job is to both understand people as well as possible, to portray their characters with as much sensitivity and insight as they can, and also to show the reality of our responsibility for our actions, for our choices as choices. In short – to understand, but not to excuse. And this is something that all of us, not just writers, should aspire to.

Posted in Writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Unloading the information overload

I’ve not updated my blog in quite a while. I’ve been busy starting a new job, working on some writing projects, and still settling into married life, trying to get the hang of managing all the exciting reponsibilities of adulthood, such as paying bills on time.

Getting used to the relentless routine of working life takes quite an adjustment. I’ve been having to think carefully about the different activities I try and be involved in, and trying to find a workable balance to our life. I’ve got quite a few thoughts on dealing with busyness that I’d like to blog about – if I find the time!

One area where it’s easy to overload is information, especially with the Internet. I’ve come across some good articles recently on slowing down and reducing the overload, especially when it comes to information and communication. These are all worth a read:

I tend to be a bit of an information junkie, reading lots of blogs, checking news websites frequently, listening to lots of podcasts, gobbling down books in quick, hurried readings, and so on.

But as with most things, quality is more important than quantity. I’ve been trying to cut out the irrelevant, and just keep up with what I really find to be worthwhile – trimming down the number of blogs I read, checking internet forums less frequently, and so on. I’ve pretty much given up on Twitter – it’s 99% distraction to 1% anything remotely useful.

Also, I’m trying to really think about and digest what I read and listen to, rather than skimming and rushing through things. I’m trying to train myself to slow down and really engage with what’s being said. Better to really understand and think through one book, than to skim and forget half a dozen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Not Brains in a Jar

Is there such thing as a Biblical epistemology (theory of knowledge)? Well, there’s no one definitive Biblical theory of knowledge that Christians would all agree on – but getting Christians to all agree on anything is very difficult, to put it mildly!

But I think that what the Bible teaches about God, the world, reality and so on, does have implications for epistemology (the philosophical study of how we know stuff). At a minimum, I think Christians are obligated to believe that there is such a thing as truth and it is knowable, otherwise the Bible’s truth claims become meaningless.

But I think our theology can help us a lot more in thinking about the nature of truth and knowledge. If God as the foundation for all reality, then the nature of God determines the nature of truth and knowledge.

Since God is trinity, I believe this implies that there often isn’t one single right way of looking at things. There are usually multiple, complementary perspectives. That doesn’t mean that totally contradictory things can both be true – we’re talking variations on the same theme rather than black being white. That we have four Gospel accounts, each with their own perspective and slant, also suggests this. Diversity in how we understand and express truth is, within reasonable limits, legitimate and valuable, and reflects the unity in diversity of God himself.

At the same time, because Father, Son and Holy Spirit are one, then in the correspondence between the persons of the trinity, I believe we have a basis for correspondence theory of truth as a legitimately Christian. Reality and truth are in a sense patterned after the relations between Father, Son and Spirit.

Another philosophical implication of what the Bible reveals about God is that he is personal, and so all of reality has a personal dimension. The idea of the knower as a neutral, detached observer is, I’d suggest, foreign to Biblical thought – we aren’t brains in a jar. God does not have a detached, impersonal knowledge of everything, but a loving, passionately committed knowledge. Knowledge yields itself most readily when we commit ourselves to its pursuit in faith and love.

This is all very speculative and off the top of my head, rather than a developed argument, but I think it’s an interesting topic to be thinking about.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Five Years

It’s now just over five years since I first arrived in Cardiff , and since I started keeping this blog. That’s a big chunk of my life, and over that time I’ve grown and changed a lot, leaving home and becoming independent of my parents, studying for my degree, starting my working life, and most recently getting married to my wonderful wife.

My sister Hannah has just started as a student in Cardiff, and is even in the same halls as me. It’s strange to notice all the different ways that her experience will be different to mine. When I arrived as a student, there was no Facebook, and no Internet access in my halls of residence. But now many of the students arrive having already made contact with their flatmates online, and when they arrive, describe what they’re up to on their Facebook statuses, which makes it very different from turning up not knowing anything about the people you’ll be living with.

One of the odd little bits of synchronicity is that the house that Bev and I now rent belongs to a friend, and back in my first couple of years as a student, I came round here every week for Navigators Bible studies. Little did I know that I would one day be living here with my wonderful wife!

If there was one piece of advice I could give to myself five years ago, it would be this: pick one or two things to commit to, and do them really well, rather than doing a dozen things half-heartedly. I loved being involved with so many different activities while at university – the student paper, debating, the Christian Union, Navigators, and many other bits and pieces that I dabbled in. But I think I’d have achieved much more, and developed more lasting friendships, if I’d really invested in just a couple of them. But I’ve only learned the value of “quality over quantity” through being over-busy as a student, so even if I could change my choices, I don’t think I would.

I’ve learned a lot and grown up a lot in that time. I’ve made up my mind on some issues, and changed my mind on others. Getting married has made me realise what a lot more I’ve got to learn – getting to grips with things like budgeting, and paying the bills and so on. They’re not glamorous, but it is exciting for Bev and I to be in control of our lives together. I believe that God has been at work in me for the better, helping me to grow in knowledge and love of him, and in the pursuit of humility, though I’ve still got a long way to go!

I wonder what the coming years will bring… Settling more and more into married life, and starting to take more of a part in life at Mack again, for one thing. I aim to become a published novelist, and hope to write scripts for television – I’m off on a course with TAPS in a couple of weeks on Continuing Drama. And looking further into the future, the next big adventure will be starting our own family. Life… it’s full of adventure!

Posted in Personal, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Some recent books…

Some of the books I’m reading or have read in the last few months:

  • Boundaries – Cloud & Townsend – generally very helpful, a few reservations
  • Starcross – Philip Reeve – just riproaringly good fun
  • Fever Crumb – Philip Reeve – mostly good, but feels incomplete
  • Perelandra – C S Lewis – brilliant, an all-time favourite
  • According to Plan – Graeme Goldsworthy – useful Biblical theology overview
  • Jango – William Nicholson – very good
  • The Soul Winner – Charles Haddon Spurgeon – clear and challenging
  • Ethics: A Very Short Introduction – Simon Blackburn – patchy; his discussion of the Bible and ethics is just embarrassing
  • The Road to Reality – Roger Penrose – fascinating summary of “how the universe works”, requires a lot of concentration
  • Gilead – Marilynne Robinson – a heart-achingly sad and beautiful novel
  • The Complete Calvin & Hobbes – very sharp and funny
Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Charlie Brooker: Chores and Cosmos

Charlie Brooker, favourite misanthrope of Guardian readers everywhere (after David Simon, of course) yesterday claimed that Contemplating the scale of the universe makes a mockery of household chores. Funnily enough, the relationship between cosmos and chores was one of the topics I mentioned in my wedding speech, but I came to a rather different conclusion:

A Perfectly Clean and Tidy House is one of those ideas that’s wonderful in principle, rather like Communism, but in practice leads to wars, revolutions, purges and gulags. But I must be true to the Cause, unless I want to find myself in the marital equivalent of Siberia.

After all, you are fighting the very forces of Entropy, which if certain scientists are to be believed, will one day bring the entire universe to the point of heat death. Heath death will be rather like the cold layer of gunk at the bottom of the sink after everything has drained away, only on a universal scale. This rather puts making sure the bed sheets are on straight into perspective.

But the quest for a well-ordered house is not in fact a gesture of cosmic futility. As Dave mentioned in his address, neither scientists or entropy will have the last word. The Bible tells us that creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay. Jesus’ resurrection is the proof that death is not the end; death will itself one day die. God isn’t just saving our souls, but all of creation.

I have just recently reread Perelandra by C S Lewis, which everyone should do regularly, if you ask me, since Perelandra is possibly my favourite novel by Lewis. The hero Ransom, while fighting the Unman on Venus, is haunted by what Lewis calls “the Empirical Bogey”, and its to this that Brooker has fallen prey:

…the great myth of our century with its gases and galaxies, its light years and evolutions, its nightmare perspectives of simple arithmetic in which everything that can possibly hold significance for the mind becomes the mere by-product of essential disorder. Always till now he had belittled it, had treated with a certain disdain its flat superlatives, its clownish amazement that different things should be of different sizes, its glib munificence of ciphers…

Part of him still knew that the size of a thing is the least important characteristic, that the material universe derived from the comparing and mythopoeic power within him that very majesty before which he was now asked to abase himself, and that mere numbers could not overawe us unless we lent them, from our own resources, that awfulness which they themselves could no more supply than a banker’s ledge. But this knowledge remained an abstraction. Mere bigness and loneliness overbore him.

In the last chapter of the book, we are given a dazzling description of the Great Dance of the cosmos, a joyful affirmation of the significance of the universe as it merrily unfolds before the great Maleldil. It is brilliantly written, verging on poetry, and a great answer to those who “add years to year, or miles to miles and galaxies to galaxies, in lumpish aggregation”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment