Is the Doctor too much of a superhero?

SuperTinkerBellJesusDoctorOver the many years of Doctor Who, the Doctor has become more and more of a superhero. The First Doctor started off as an old man, a crochety explorer, who got dragged into events and was more likely to be trying to get back to the TARDIS than to save the day. He could be outwitted for months on end by Marco Polo pinching his TARDIS key. Sometimes he did things of dubious morality, like sabotaging his own ship to get his way to explore Skaro, and got things wrong and made mistakes.

But over time, he has become more and more of a conventional hero, running, jumping, saving the world on a weekly basis. He’s developed a whole array of superhuman abilities, from regeneration to respiratory bypass, from telepathy to time manipulation. He has almost limitless abilities to manipulate technology, and seemingly encyclopaedic knowledge of the entire universe and all of history.

Part of this is due to escalation: there’s always the desire to make things bigger, to give the Doctor ever greater challenges, to save not just a few people, but the world; not just the world, but the universe.

Part of this is due to shorter stories since the series returned – there isn’t as much time for the Doctor to discover things, make mistakes before learning from them, and so on. Because he’s the Doctor, he always wins, and because most weeks he’s only got 45 minutes in which to do so, he needs to know all about every alien species and have the ability to defeat his enemies with the flick of the switch.

But the more difficult it is for the Doctor to succeed, the greater the drama and more interesting the story, and the more heroic the Doctor actually is. His knowledge and abilities, though greater than normal, need to be limited, otherwise it undermines his heroism. Should the Doctor (and hence the stories told in Doctor Who) be brought down to a more human level? Is it possible to put the genie of the super-Doctor back in the bottle?

I believe so. I think the Doctor’s “abilities” should be limited to:

  • his long life and ability to regenerate
  • his great knowledge and experience

The first point means he shouldn’t reveal a spurious new alien ability to get the writer out of a corner, which is very dramatically unsatisfying. The cliffhanger resolution to Aliens of London is a case in point: there hasn’t been anything to suggest that the Slitheen’s method of killing off the experts on aliens is targeted at humans in particular, or has any reason not to work on Time Lords, and so it feels like a cheat when the Doctor goes “Aha! Lethal to humans, maybe, but I’m not human!”. Other examples include the Doctor’s radiation-manipulating abilities from Smith & Jones, his respiratory bypass system from the classic series, and so on.

On the second point, the Doctor shouldn’t know too much. A wide general knowledge is fine, but the universe is mind-bogglingly big, and even in 900 years, you could only learn about a tiny fraction of the civilisations and history and technologies of even one galaxy, let alone the entire universe. It should be the norm rather than the exception for the Doctor not to know about the latest monster or planet.

It also means that the Doctor shouldn’t have his amazing Magic Science Skills, whereby he can turn any piece of technology into a “Defeat Villain Now” button with a wave of the sonic screwdriver. The DoctorDonna’s defeat of the Daleks by pressing a few buttons in Journey’s End is a perfect example of this. Yes, it’s Donna who does this, not the Doctor, but the only way this makes any kind of sense is if the Doctor’s Magic Science Skills are a superpower that can get transferred, like Superman’s powers with the help of kryptonite (a.k.a. plotdeviceite) and a convenient lightening strike.

When the Doctor uses technology to solve the plot, it needs to make sense within the logic of the story so far. The Poison Sky gets points in my book because there’s a good reason for Rattigan to have an atmospheric converter, and so the way the gas is dispelled is set up in advance rather than relying on the Doctor’s amazing Magic Science Skills. It loses points for having the Doctor set fire to the atmosphere without any harm or damage at all, but there you go.

The Family of Blood contains one of the most blatant example of Magic Science Skills at work, when the Doctor blows up the Family’s spaceship just by flicking some switches. It gets away with it because that’s not the real climax: the actual crisis point is the decision for John Smith to open the watch and become the Doctor again, so the story is still satisfying because the how of how the Doctor defeats the villains isn’t the point. But while the Doctor being “fire and ice and rage” is exciting and cool at the time, but it’s unsustainable to keep on writing the character that way. He needs to be brought back down to Earth.

I think it’s a fallacy to say, as some fans have argued, that because the Doctor has defeated gods and armies of monsters, a human can never be a challenge to him. There’s something wonderful about a hero who can save the universe one week and then be foiled by someone pinching his keys the next week. The villains in Doctor Who are often defeated by something painfully simple and obvious, and the same principle can apply to the Doctor: he may be brilliant, but when he’s used to facing down hordes of Daleks, sometimes it’s the simple things that can catch him out. There’s a lot of mileage in that.

I also think that it ultimately undermines the Doctor if he’s saving the world every week. There are lots of reasons why smaller scale stories should be more common. For one thing, it forces the writer to make us actually care about the characters and the world that we see on screen to involve us and raise the stakes, rather than David Tennant going googly-eyed and babbling about the end of the world. It also requires more variety in plots than having yet another alien species wanting to “build a new Empire” (it’s always an Empire, otherwise how would we know they are Evil?) For another thing, it makes it really matter when the Doctor does save the entire world.

You need the rhythm and variation from smaller to bigger, from intimate to epic. Doctor Who has an almost unparalleled ability to do that, but is in danger of constantly going for “EPIC!” to the point of monotony. Sometimes you have to go smaller to go bigger.

Posted in Media | Tagged , | 1 Comment

My next book!

I’m still busy enjoying the buzz of being a newly published author, but details of the book containing my next short story are now online!

Once again, it’s an anthology of Doctor Who stories published by Big Finish. Short Trips: Indefinable Magic takes the magical and fantastic as its theme. Edited by Neil Corry, it contains tales both by Doctor Who veterans like Gareth Roberts, Steve Lyons and Simon Guerrier, as well stories by some of the new writers like myself from How the Doctor Changed My Life.

My story is called Blessed are the Peacemakers, and contains the words “hippopotamus”, “infidel” and “virus”. If you listen to A Podcast of Impossible Things, you might have heard a few more details from one of my looser-tongued fellow podcasters in an edition where I was away, but I won’t reveal too much at this stage.

At the moment I’m just putting the finishing touches to my entry for Red Planet Pictures’ scriptwriting competition, which closes on Tuesday. The script contains the words “banana”, “primogeniture” and “shed”, and the line “Not even superheroes can get away with murder”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

My Doctor Who short story hits the bookshops!

Short Trips: How the Doctor Changed My Life, a collection of brand new Doctor Who short stories published by Big Finish is now available, and it includes The Shopping Trolleys of Doom – my very first piece of professionally published fiction!

The theme of the collection is people’s lives who have been changed by the Doctor, for good or bad. Mine is about Joe Stevens, an ordinary supermarket worker who notices that the shopping trolleys are behaving strangely. Here’s a short extract from the beginning to whet your appetite…

‘Oi, wait!’ I shouted, lowering my spanner from fixing a shopping trolley. I’d been staring at the newspaper stand, each paper with flashing images of the latest wave of spaceships heading out of the solar system, brave explorers among the new planets. I imagined what it would be like to be a hero out there with them, discovering new places and creatures.

And then I noticed a scruffy man slipping some bread under his grey overcoat. My head was in the stars but my life was stuck down here on Earth. Stopping a shoplifter was the greatest adventure I’d ever have. I sighed as the man quickened his pace, hurrying nervously towards the main exit of Megamart…

There are previews of the other stories on the Big Finish Facebook group. You can order the book directly from the publishers, Big Finish, who also publish some very good audio dramas, or from Amazon, or from your local bookshop, who should be able to order a copy if they don’t have it in stock.

And although it’s my first published fiction, it definitely won’t be my last – I’ve already got another short story accepted for publication in the spring, and work continues apace on my fantasy novel. If you buy a copy of Short Trips, I’ll be very happy to sign it for you, and if I become the next J K Rowling, then it could be worth a ton of money! I can but dream…

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

When Science meets Fiction

CERN’s Large Hadron Collider on the French-Swiss border has been getting a lot of attention as scientists prepare to smash particles into each other in an attempt to learn the secrets of the early universe and understand better the nature of matter itself.

All very exciting, and unsurprisingly, the project is very attractive to science fiction writers. Dan Brown’s Angel and Demons involved the theft of anti-matter from the facility, and a Torchwood radio play on BBC Radio 4 saw Captain Jack, Gwen and Ianto coming up against a neutron-eating alien.

Needless to say, these stories don’t worry themselves too much with getting the science right, and just get on with spinning their yarn. But James Gillies of CERN has some interesting thoughts on CERN in science fiction and on the relationship between scientific investigation and imaginative storytelling:

The facade of Torchwood’s magnificent backdrop, the Wales Millennium
Centre, is adorned with words penned by the country’s national poet,
Gwyneth Lewis: “Creu gwir fel gwydr o ffwrnais awen (Creating truth
like glass from inspiration’s furnace)/ In these stones horizons sing
“?
Did she know when she wrote them that she too would visit CERN? Her
words would sit as comfortably over the door of a science lab as they
do on an arts complex. And perhaps that’s the point. Both enrich
humanity, and the more often they get together the better.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quizzed about Daleks

My friend Dave works at the Western Mail, which means that when they run a story on Doctor Who, I sometimes get a phone call if they want a quote from a fan.

Last week I was asked my opinion about the Doctor Who Exhibition being expanded, including the addition of more Daleks, and was quoted in the article, which you can read on the Wales Online site at the above link.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nobody really writes novels any more

Lawrence Miles observes in an interview how the novel has been been almost entirely replaced by the wannabe movie novelisation…

Nobody really writes novels any more. What they write are films in novel form, everything’s staged as if it were happening through the lens of a camera, and obviously it’s a trend that’s been getting worse ever since the invention of the feature film but- I think we’ve reached the point now where there’s no pretence about it, I certainly don’t think there’s anybody fighting the tendency anywhere in popular literature.

There’s no interest in using language as a medium, basically. If you read a modern novel it’s virtually all about sight and sound, every scene’s described in terms of visuals and dialogue and very little else. Every so often characters will smell or taste or feel something, but only when it’s an important plot-point. You know. Someone’s going to smell gas just before there’s a big cinematic explosion, or the hero’s going to eat something and be able to taste poison in it, and sometimes there’ll be a crap one-line attempt at doing “emotion” but it’ll usually come down to stock phrases. It’ll be “he felt a sharp pang of fear as the lion bore down on him”, and then the “fear” thing will end up being pushed to one side and the writer will just start describing what the lion looks like.

Sometimes you’ll even see these desperate attempts to fit film clichés into book form, so a character will- oh, I don’t know- he’ll fall over, and then lift up his head and see a pair of legs in front of him, and you just know that in the author’s head he’s thinking about that shot you get in movies where the bad guy stands over the good guy and you see the good guy framed between the bad guy’s feet…

Film’s over-writing literature entirely. It’s a ridiculous, stupid waste of the novel form, to treat it as if it’s just a second-rate version of cinema.
The sum total of my published (or due to be published) fiction so far is two Doctor Who short stories, and naturally enough writing for a tv tie-in, I deliberately attempt to recreate in print the spirit of the tv show. But I probably haven’t done much to really exploit the short story form uniquely – both stories could be adapted fairly straightforwardly to screen.

So the challenge for me as a writer, especially in my original fiction, is to really hone my craft as not just a storyteller but as a novelist, to learn to be good at all that stuff that you can do in prose that can’t be done elsewhere.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Life without Television

There’s an interesting article on Yahoo News about People Who Live Without TV (shock! horror!).

I’m not too fussed about having a television. As long as I’m able to watch Doctor Who round with friends or online via the BBC iPlayer, there’s not much television I’d really miss. My techno-addiction is the Internet rather than the tellybox!

For maximum irony, perhaps someone should make a reality TV programme about families giving up television?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Genre and Gravitas

I had a look at the blog’s visitor statistics, and noticed that I’d got a slight bump in hits from one particular site. Investigating further, I found that someone had linked to my post on Fantasy and Imagination from The Comics Journal Message Board, where a very interesting and articulate discussion on Making Superheroes “Mature” is taking place. Fancy that – intelligent discussion on the Internet! Will wonders never cease?

The opening post by Mike Hunter poses the question of how do you “expand the limitations of genre work (even striving to push it in the direction of Art) without violating those factors which make the formula work”?

This widens out into other points of discussion, including whether “Part of maturation entails learning that there are no true ‘heroes’, and certainly not ‘super’-ones”, as poster D Grim argues. And if so, does this mean that the superhero genre is inherently escapist?

You could easily transpose this discussion to be about Doctor Who, and the extent to which it can be “mature” within its generic conventions. Indeed, the Doctor is a superhero, at least in his 21st century guise.

My view is that it’s possible for all literature, including genre fiction, to function in one of two ways: as Fantasy, an escape away from the world, or as Imagination, giving new ways of looking at the real world (see my post on Fantasy vs Imagination.)

Genre fiction is fiction that has acquired conventions and expectations and clichés over time. Having a form and framework can be useful, like working within the rules of a sonnet. But genre can easily become a substitute for creativity, rather than an aid for it: for example, all the indistinguishable Tolkien rip-offs in the fantasy genre.

The driving force behind this is pandering to what the readers want. Rather than giving them something new that might challenge and enlarge them, you just repeat the same old thing. I argue in part one of my review of series 4 of Doctor Who that you can see this process at work.

This plays to the modern narcissistic outlook, where we’re concerned with gratifying our existing desires rather than seeking to be touched by and to grow towards something greater than ourselves, outside of ourselves, qualities like Goodness, Beauty and Truth.

But popular culture such as Doctor Who and superhero stories, and other tales of the fantastic, including heroes and monsters, magic and spaceships, has the potential to give us new perspectives and insights with greater clarity and interest than so-called realistic fiction, when written with imagination and originality, and written to point beyond itself to greater realities.

It is possible, though sometimes difficult, to write popular fiction that is both entertaining and meaningful. Writers should aim for no less, and audiences should expect no less, than this.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Culture of Narcissism

The modern person is in the grip of a new psychological consciousness – one that is extremely pre-occupied with the self. We have become a culture of Narcissism.

So says Andrew Fellows in his paper “The Culture of Narcissism“, which can be downloaded from the L’Abri website. He also has a series of four lectures on the subject available to download as free mp3s from Bethinking.org. Go and have a read and a listen – they’re really intelligent and insightful.

What is the culture of narcissism?

As a psychological personality disorder the diagnosis of ‘Narcissist’ is extremely rare. However, the condition provides a model for understanding our own culture. there are factors at work that have produced a new character that is narcissistic. This is the age of self in a unique way. Where humans have universally been selfish (since the Fall) Narcissism is something unique. It is not a metaphor of the human condition; rather, it provides a way of understanding the psychological impact of recent social and ideological changes in our culture.

It is also important to distinguish Narcissism from modern individualism. Where individualism is a description of the ‘economic’ self, Narcissism is a description of the ‘psychological self’. Individualism describes the pursuit of wealth and material comfort. Narcissism describes the pursuit of identity and personal well being. This is why I believe that the Narcissistic model describes a new state of human consciousness – one that redefines the nature of the real. It may literally be the fulfilment of the apostle Paul’s description of the human in its last phase. 2 Tim 3:1-2 – “in the last days men will be lovers of self” – literally they will fall in love with themselves.

I’m planning on doing a series on how the modern narcissistic consciousness affects various aspects of our culture and our lives, analysing them in light of Fellows’ ideas. I believe it will help bring together many aspects of many of the things that have interested me on this blog. Here’s some of the things I hope to cover:

  • Narcissism and Art
  • Narcissism and Entertainment
  • Narcissism and Doctor Who (which provides an interesting case study for the above!)
  • Narcissism and Consumerism
  • Narcissism and Self-Image
  • Narcissism and Relationships
  • Narcissism and Knowledge
  • Narcissism and Religion

Stay tuned!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Contagious 2008: Spiritual Warfare

Last week, I attended Contagious, a Christian youth camp, which I’ve been going on since I was 14 and I’m now a leader on. The theme this year was Spiritual Warfare. It’s one of those subjects that’s often happy hunting ground for weirdos: a subject much loved by eccentric televangelists and paranoid fruitcakes. So it was really good to look in depth at what the Bible has to say about the spiritual battle that we all face, whether we’re aware of it or not. I hope to blog on some of the main topics covered soon.

It wasn’t all Bible study and preaching though. One of the main ways in which I contributed to the conference was putting on a stage play of John Bunyan’s book The Holy War. Like his better-known The Pilgrim’s Progress, it’s an allegory for certain Christian truths, as well as a very entertaining story. It tells of how the city of Mansoul falls into the hands of the evil Diabolus, and how King Shaddai makes war to liberate it from its bondage.

I adapted it into a 45 minute script, based on the children’s version called The Story of Mansoul, an adaptation by Peter Woodcock, one of the Contagious leaders, and from Thelma Jenkins’ modern English version. It was performed by Taskforce, with the part of Diabolus played by myself.

It’s the first stage production I’ve written and had produced, and I couldn’t be more pleased with the final result. Everyone put lots of work into it, not only Taskforce but others including Olivia Murray who co-produced and directed it with me, Carrie Evans who helped organise props and costumes, and Joel Evans and Richard Gaul who did the sound and lighting. Thanks to everyone’s hard work, it was far better than I thought would be possible in the time available, and really went down well with the audience.

But my hope and prayer is that it wasn’t just entertaining, but also helped point to the miserableness of Satan and his lies, and the beauty of King Jesus and his victory. If you’re interested in getting a copy of the script to use in any way, please contact me via the email address on my profile.

Contagious is also a wonderful opportunity to meet Christian friends old and new. As well as meeting lots of good friends from previous years who mean a lot to me and have had a lot of input into my development as a Christian and as a person, I also enjoyed getting to know new punters, particularly from my SUS group (“Scripture Under Scrutiny”, small Bible study group), and new leaders. The chats, conversations, and discussions throughout the week frequently amounted to more than just friendship, and were really good fellowship.

I can’t mention everyone, but one particularly memorable character is Jason Ramasami, who is, among other things, an illustrator and cartoonist, who brought a lot of personality and creativity to the seminars and workshops that he led, and to the conference generally. He organised a 30 Second Film Festival, and has set up a blog, Punters’ Progress, to showcase these videos and also other stuff relating to this year’s Contagious.

The teaching was excellent: detailed, Biblical, hard-hitting, practical and encouraging. MP3s of the talks are usually available on the Contagious website following the conference, so stay tuned for those!

Posted in Faith, Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment