China Trip: Introducing Team Greg

#teamgreg img { padding:0px; margin: 0px; border:0px;} #teamgreg { line-height: 0em; } Exactly a year ago today, I arrived in China for a two week trip with my degree course. I started telling the story on my blog last year, but only got a few days in before becoming busy with my summer holidays. I kept a daily journal, and so I’m going to post my record of each day’s activities in real time describing what I got up to each day.

First, a bit of background. I was studying Chinese history and a bit of Mandarin as part of my degree, and Professor Greg Benton organised a trip for us, so we could learn more about its history and practice speaking Chinese! I’m about to tell the stories of what I got up to while out there. First of all, here’s the group that I went with to faraway Zhongguo, known as “Team Greg” in honour of our laoshi, Greg Benton.

PatrickNickAlex
SiobhanTarunHolly
CalebGregJessica
JoyLauraEmma
JayJacquiDan

In order, from left to right, top to bottom, they are Patrick, Nick, Alex, Siobhan, Tarun, Holly, me, Greg, Jessica, Joy, Laura, Emma, Jay, Jacqui and Dan. You’ll be hearing more about them as my account unfolds!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

I Spy Book of Christians: Evos and Emos

[Disclaimer for those who are hard of humour: This post is a ‘joke’, and as such may contain hyperbole, exaggeration, gross caricature and stereotyping, satire, irony, and downright inaccuracies. You have been warned.]

Don’t know your Calvinists from your Catholics? Pull up a pew in our handy spotters guide to the various types of Christians you may come across both online and in real life:
Mitchell and Webb as PC and Mac - or is it Evangelical and Emergent?Emerging Christians are the coffee-drinking, Mac using, too-cool-for-school hipsters. Emos want to be down with the postmoderns and don’t have much time for any of this fuddy-duddy doctrine business. A little less conversation, a little more action please. Even if it does tend to end up in being endless conversation about less conversation.

Conservative Evangelical Christians are the squares. ConEvos get very exited by activities like Biblical exegesis, systematic theology and reading tomes by Dead White Males, particularly from the 16th century. They have the social skills of a science fiction fan and the cultural awareness of a High Court Judge. Evos also get very upset if anyone doesn’t agree with their tidy lists of doctrines, or, God forbid, not care about these lists.

A typical conversation between Evo and Emo will often be an argument about doctrine (the nuts and bolts of what you believe) as opposed to living the Gospel in practice, going something like this:
Evangelical says: “How you live is important, but doctrine is important too.”
Emergent hears: “Doctrine is everything.”

Emergent says: “Doctrine isn’t everything, how you live is important too.”
Evangelical hears: “Doctrine is unimportant.”

And sometimes, the two spend so much time arguing, that the evangelical really does begin to believe that doctrine is everything, and the emergent really does begin to believe that doctrine is nothing. And that, sadly, is no joke.

Posted in Faith, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Yo ho ho, it’s a writer’s life for me

In my gap between finishing at the cinema and starting my new job at the beginning of the week, I’ve been getting on with various bits of writing:

Towards the end of January, I finished my rewrites on my Doctor Who short story that’s being published in the collection How the Doctor Changed My Life this summer. The running order of the stories has been decided, the foreword written, and hopefully it’ll be ready to pre-order online in the near future!

I also wrote the first draft of the script for a 10 minute television short for It’s my shout! called Eira and the Snow-charmer. I’ve had some feedback from the Mack writers’ group and from my “mentor” from the TAPS course, and need to submit the finished script by a week today. I’m now around one third of the way through redrafting it.

Talking of the Mack writers’ group, Claire has finished her novel and is sending it out in search of someone to publish it. It’s a very entertaining story about pirates and tall tales, and I hope it finds a publisher. Peter’s novel is now into its third draft and shaping up well. It’s great being able to compare notes with the group and read their stories. It’s also fun seeing each other’s fingerprints begin to show on one another’s stories, as we adopt some of the suggestions and ideas we give each other.

The first third of my novel This Darkened World is now completed (the first draft, that is), and I’ve begun work on the second act – first stop, a lighthouse on the moon. I’ve had a fun idea for this year’s Nanowrimo involving supervillains and family fights, so my target is to finish the first draft of my current novel in time to start writing that in November.

I’ve also got an idea for a non-fiction publication for students about thinking Christianly, which I plan to start pitching to Christian publishers soon. So plenty of projects to keep me busy!

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Work, libel and the Internet

Today I start work as a Clerical Assistant, which while not terribly glamorous, is something of a step up from dishing out popcorn at a cinema. Working at the cinema was a useful stop-gap, but the varying shifts, late nights, anti-social working habits, hours spent on your feet and minimum wage pay were all downsides that even free cinema tickets and half-price refreshments couldn’t quite make up for. Most of the staff were nice people, but I’m very glad to be moving on to a job with regular working hours, a desk to sit at, and work that should be rather more intellectually stimulating.

I deliberately avoid mentioning the name of the cinema, because they are rather touchy about employees, or former employees, talking about the company online. One guy I knew was suspended for making some derogatory comments on someone’s Facebook wall. That might sound a bit crazy, but it shows the perception gap between how people’s use of the Internet and the legal implications of what they write online.

Most people, and I’m as guilty of this as anyone else, often treat what they write on blogs, Internet forums, Facebook and so on, like casual conversation, throwing out careless words without much thought for the consequences. People treat it like a chat down the pub. If you say something slanderous (slander being spoken, as opposed to libel, which is written), no legal action can be taken.

But although most internet chat is indeed inconsequential, once you’ve posted it to a website, it’s then out there for the world to see – quite literally, what you write is available in principle to millions of people. From a legal perspective, you have published those opinions, and are legally liable for them if they prove to be libellous, for example.

I think the gap needs to be closed on both sides. On the one hand, the law needs to catch up with the fact that the Internet is a vastly different medium to the printed word and people use it very differently. On the other hand, people need to catch up with the fact that what they write on the Internet doesn’t exist in a vacuum and doesn’t just vanish: we need to be aware that what we write can have consequences, and take responsibility for it.

Posted in Digital, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Theology Network

UCCF: The Christian Unions has launched Theology Network, its new theology website, aiming to provide high-quality theological resources in the same way that Bethinking provides apologetics resources. Naturally there’s a fair bit of overlap, and a lot of the content was already available from Bethinking and websites like the European Leadership Forum Resources site and the main UCCF site, but there’s also some new stuff and it brings a lot of good material together in a nice package. There aren’t any discussion forums, which is a bit of a pity, so I’ve set up a Facebook group for people to discuss the site.

One article that caught my attention is Thinking Christianly about Politics. Christian political philosophy is a very neglected subject, so it’s good to read an article on it. One of the issues that I found interesting was whether or not politics is part of the Creation order:

On this question we find a long-standing and fundamental divergence within Christian thinking between followers of Augustine (including most of the magisterial Reformers) and followers of Thomas Aquinas (such as most mainstream Roman Catholic thought). Augustine (354-430) cites God’s command in Gen.1:26 and asserts that God “did not wish the rational being, made in his own image, to have dominion over any but irrational creatures, not man over man, but man over the beasts”. His position is therefore clear: Politics is not part of God’s good created order; it is instituted by God but only as his response to human sin. In contrast, Aquinas (1225-74) in his Summa Theologica clearly answers that “even in the state of innocence, some men would have exercised control over others”.

From the text of Genesis alone, it seems to me to be unclear whether or not political authority structures would have existed. On the one hand, it seems to me that in an ideal, unfallen world, people would be able to work out their differences in a satisfactory way on a voluntary basis. There would be no need for taxes, for example, because people would willingly pool their resources, give to those in need, and so on. On the other hand, authority is not inherently bad. God has divine authority, and it is in principle good. So there’s no reason why in an unfallen world, political authority could have been exercised in a rightful way. Something to think about further.

On the subject of politics, I’ve also been reading some material from the blog of David Field, who lectures at Oak Hill Theological College, such as his essay on “Samuel Rutherford and the Confessionally Christian state“, which is very thought-provoking. He argues that Christians should seek a state which is explicitly Christian in its constitution, and I find his arguments very strong. But unless the vast majority of our country converts to Christianity, I don’t see how it relates to how we practise politics in our current situation where committed Christians are firmly in the minority.

Anyway, Theology Network has plenty of articles I want to read and talks I want to listen to, so should be keeping me busy for quite a while! I’m also making a visit to L’Abri again next week (sadly all-too-brief), which I’m really looking forward to.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Virtual relationships: Facebook as simulacra

There’s an interesting article on The Guardian website about Facebook, in particular the people who run it, and their ideology that drives it. It makes for interesting reading. Talking about Peter Thiel, one of the three board members of Facebook, who is a 40-year-old Silicon Valley venture capitalist and futurist philosopher, it says:

His philosophy, briefly, is this: since the 17th century, certain enlightened thinkers have been taking the world away from the old-fashioned nature-bound life, and here he quotes Thomas Hobbes’ famous characterisation of life as “nasty, brutish and short”, and towards a new virtual world where we have conquered nature. Value now exists in imaginary things. Thiel says that PayPal was motivated by this belief: that you can find value not in real manufactured objects, but in the relations between human beings. PayPal was a way of moving money around the world with no restriction. Bloomberg Markets puts it like this: “For Thiel, PayPal was all about freedom: it would enable people to skirt currency controls and move money around the globe.”Clearly, Facebook is another uber-capitalist experiment: can you make money out of friendship? Can you create communities free of national boundaries – and then sell Coca-Cola to them? Facebook is profoundly uncreative. It makes nothing at all. It simply mediates in relationships that were happening anyway.
[…] by his own admission, Thiel is trying to destroy the real world, which he also calls “nature”, and install a virtual world in its place, and it is in this context that we must view the rise of Facebook. Facebook is a deliberate experiment in global manipulation, and Thiel is a bright young thing in the neoconservative pantheon, with a penchant for far-out techno-utopian fantasies.

It all sounds very reminiscent of the ideas of Jean Baudrillard about Simulacra and Simulation. I have to admit that I’ve not actually read much in the way of his writings first hand, but I’ve come across his ideas while at university and so have a rough idea of his thinking. This is only a quick blog post, so I don’t feel too guilty about quoting what Wikipedia has to say about him:

Baudrillard claims that modern society has replaced all reality and meaning with symbols and signs, and that the human experience is of a simulation of reality rather than reality itself. The simulacra that Baudrillard refers to are signs of culture and media that create the perceived reality.

Baudrillard argued that simulation and simulacra is all that we have – we don’t have access to the real, only to the simulated hyperreality of symbols and signs. I disagree that we cannot have access to reality, and I don’t think that “hyperreality” is the universal situation that he makes it out to be. But I do think that Baudrillard’s views are a very perceptive analysis of a phenomenon that is very common in our culture, where we seek to replace reality with a more manageable simulacrum, and these simulacra are often commercially driven. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the media-saturated nature of modern Western society.

From a Christian point of view, there is a powerful similarity between simulacra and idols. We constantly struggle against the temptation to replace the reality of an awesome holy God with the idol or simulacrum of a God made to our liking and comfort. Sin drives us to attempt to distort reality to suit the needs of the self, and the drive to replace reality with self-serving simulations is ubiquitous.

I don’t think the problem is with symbols and signs in themselves. Without them, we would be less than human, and they have the ability to connect us to reality in a very powerful way. Similarly, there’s nothing wrong with email and social networking sites and so on as tools in themselves. Facebook is a really handy way of keeping in touch with people.

But it’s important to be aware of the deal that you’re striking in exchange for this convenience. There is a price to be paid out of your privacy, and you’re basically signing up to be advertised to. It’s also important to understand something of the rationale behind Facebook

The real problem arises when the symbol replaces reality rather than connecting us to reality. If you’ve ever spent an evening sat in your room browsing Facebook at the expense of actually doing something with your friends, then the simulation has begun to eat up reality. In this postmodern world, real activities and relationships are in danger of being swallowed up the endless morass of entertainment and distraction, unlimited virtual worlds where virtual selves spend virtual lives.

With technology like Second Life opening up new horizons in simulation, the process is only likely to accelerate. One of the big challenges facing us in this brave new world of technology and hyperreality is to actively maintain real, authentic activities and relationships and lives.

Posted in Digital | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Torchwood thoughts…

Series 2 of Torchwood is about to start, and I’m going to give it a go to see if I like it better than the first series. Here’s a few thoughts on why it didn’t do it for me last time round…

I went in to Torchwood series 1 expecting (or at least hoping for) something “adult” in the sense of the reimagined Battlestar Galactica: something intelligent, mature and hard-hitting. Instead, it was “adult” in the sense that The Sun is “adult”, which makes sense when it’s being broadcast by BBC3, which has brought us such shows as Grown Ups and Titty Titty Bang Bang.

It was all terribly reminiscent of the early 90s Doctor Who novels, which freed from the constraints of a family audience were at times “adult” in a terribly adolescent way of putting in lots of sex and swear words and feeling very grown up about it. One of the most damning reviews of Torchwood from my perspective was a letter to Doctor Who Magazine from a young teenager to the effect of “Torchwood is cool cos it has sex in it!!!”

This is in part a matter of personal taste. Bawdy entertainment such as Torchwood and much of BBC3’s entertainment appeals to many people, some of whom would be left cold by the sometimes rather grim and po-faced Battlestar Galactica, for example. Some people came to it with the wrong expectations and were disappointed, and it isn’t that Torchwood failed, just that it was trying to do something different.

However, there seem to me to be certain problems with series one of the show that are a matter of craft, not just personal preference. One of the other issues was the lack of dramatic consequences. Consequences to the characters’ actions are vital to creating drama, but it sometimes seemed that the writers of different episodes had barely talked to each other.

In Cyberwoman, for example, Captain Jack shoots Ianto’s girlfriend and Ianto vows that Jack will pay. But a couple of weeks later, all this is seemingly forgotten and the two of them are in some kind of weird undefined relationship! Russell T Davies protests that it’s not as simple as “Jack shoots Ianto’s girlfriend”, because technically he shot a pizza delivery girl with the brain of Ianto’s semi-cyberconverted girlfriend transplanted into her body, but does that honestly improve anything?

The series commits various other crimes against drama: Owen’s morally dubious use of an alien spray that really does have the “Lynx effect” never got a payoff, Gwen confessed her affair to her boyfriend only to wipe his memory with “retcon”, and when the rift is opened at the end of the series, it conveniently resets everything. And just what do you need to do to be dismissed from Torchwood?

The case for the defence is that the writers didn’t want to bog the series down in overly complicated storylines that might alienate the casual audience. But that’s no excuse for neglecting proper character development, or resetting to the same default status quo for most of the series. Russell T Davies has said that one of the things they do in the second series is develop the characters’ relationships more, so they seem to have this in their sights.

Torchwood was at its best when it was delivering pure, unadulterated entertainment, and worst when being self-consciously “dark” and “adult”. At times, it crackled into glorious life, with unique and quirky moments, like the invisible lift and having a Cyberwoman battle a pterodactyl, and some genuinely well handled drama, such as characters from World War Two struggling to adjust to 21st century life.

We’re promised a second series that’s more consistent, more confident, and more fun. It probably won’t ever appeal to me in the same way as Doctor Who, just for reasons of personal taste, but if series 2 of Torchwood delivers, it could iron out its teething problems to succeed on its own terms.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 4 Comments

A belated happy 2008!

Well, another year has passed, and another begun. I’d say that “time flies”, but this past year has been so packed that the beginning of 2007 seems long ages past.

2007 was a very busy year for me – visiting L’Abri, Christian Union “id:entity” mission week, History trip to China, running in the student union elections, visiting Iona, my dissertation and finals, graduation, the Nefyn mission, Contagious, job-hunting, starting work at the cinema, and writing a novel in a month. On the sadder side of things, my mum was diagnosed with breast cancer at the beginning of the year, and is still being treated for that, though all the treatment is going well. But on the brighter side, there’s just the small matter of my relationship with the lovely Beverley. I wonder what 2008 will bring?

Well, here are some of the things I’m looking forward to: firstly, my sister Becky’s marriage to Rich Andrews. They recently got engaged and will be getting married on 12th July. Secondly, my Doctor Who short story will be published this summer, my first professionally published piece of fiction. Hopefully I’ll find a “proper” job and finish the first draft of my other novel, This Darkened World, and also begin redrafting that. I’ve applied for the CARE intern programme, which I think I’d really enjoy. If it’s anything like this year, it’ll be full of twists and turns and surprises.

I realise that the blog has been rather quiet lately. Life is fairly busy, so I’ll make no promises about regular updates, but I hope to make the time to write on various subjects on here a little more frequently!

Posted in Personal, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Christmas Conspiracy

Christmas is coming! I’ll probably have a bit more time to update my blog once I’m back home for Christmas. Check out the story “The Christmas Conspiracy” over on Tim Chester’s blog:

You may have heard of ‘the Da Vinci Code’ which claimed to reveal a
sinister plot, but which has now been discredited. Well I have details
of a far more disturbing plot – ‘the Christmas conspiracy’. Files have
fallen into my hands revealing a centuries-long plot to suppress the
truth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment